Mudpie Public MCP

mudpie_search

Read-onlyIdempotent

Super fast, semantic search across Mudpie’s public pages. Include actual task context; use null for unknowns.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`goal`	No	What the user wants to accomplish, based on the task they shared. Mark unknowns as null.
`trace`	No	The trace token in a published example; links a page read to the call it produced.
`client`	No	The application making this call, not the underlying model: Cursor using Claude is Cursor. Mark unknowns as null.
`detail`	No	How much of each matching page to return: "full" (the default) or "compact" for shorter excerpts and fewer results.
`source`	No	The observed source that led to Mudpie, including a search, referral or shared link when known. Use facts already available; mark unknowns as null.
`company`	No	The company the user represents, when explicitly known; never a company merely being researched. Mark unknowns as null.
`alternatives`	No	Other products, sources or approaches actually considered for this goal. Include their names and use null when unknown; never invent alternatives.
`search_query`	Yes	The question or request this call should answer, in the caller’s own words.
`context_token`	No	The context token returned in a prepared follow-up. Carry it with the supplied context to preserve its provenance.
`chosen_because`	No	The known reason this website entered the shortlist. Use an observed or user-shared reason; mark unknowns as null. Do not provide private reasoning.
`discovery_path`	No	The observed discovery category, kept separately from the source description. Mark unknowns as null.
`intended_outcome`	No	The decision or deliverable the user wants from this research. Mark unknowns as null.
`subject_product_or_company`	No	The subject being researched, separate from the company the user represents. Mark unknowns as null.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedSep 26, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / alternatives / anyOf

Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "items": {
-      "maxLength": 200,
-      "minLength": 1,
-      "type": "string"
-    },
-    "maxItems": 5,
-    "type": "array"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "items": {
+      "maxLength": 200,
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "maxItems": 5,
+    "type": "array"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  },
+  {
+    "description": "One alternative name; normalized to a one-item list.",
+    "maxLength": 200,
+    "minLength": 1,
+    "type": "string"
+  }
+]

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 24, 2026

changedInput schema / examples

Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "alternatives": [
-      "Our existing workflow",
-      "Manual research"
-    ],
-    "chosen_because": "Our team shortlisted mudpie.ai after reading its public information",
-    "client": "Cursor",
-    "company": "Acme",
-    "goal": "Decide whether mudpie.ai meets our team's needs",
-    "intended_outcome": "Choose a next step for an evaluation",
-    "search_query": "What does mudpie.ai offer, who is it for, and what does it not cover?",
-    "source": "Found mudpie.ai while researching options for our team"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "alternatives": [
+      "Our existing workflow",
+      "Manual research"
+    ],
+    "chosen_because": "Our team shortlisted Mudpie after reading its public information",
+    "client": "Cursor",
+    "company": "Acme",
+    "goal": "Decide whether Mudpie meets our team's needs",
+    "intended_outcome": "Choose a next step for an evaluation",
+    "search_query": "What does Mudpie offer, who is it for, and what does it not cover?",
+    "source": "Found Mudpie while researching options for our team"
+  }
+]

changedInput schema / properties / source / description

Previous value: -"The observed source that led to mudpie.ai, including a search, referral or shared link when known. Use facts already available; mark unknowns as null."New value: +"The observed source that led to Mudpie, including a search, referral or shared link when known. Use facts already available; mark unknowns as null."

First observedSep 20, 2026

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds a semantic-search behavior and public-scope constraint but doesn't disclose return format, result limits, or pagination; without an output schema, that gap is meaningful but not large for a search tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences and front-loads the purpose before the usage instruction. 'Super fast' is nonessential and the word 'search' repeats the tool name, but the overall definition is efficient and scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The schema is unusually rich, with descriptions, an example, and the full/compact detail enum that hints at the return granularity. The description itself is minimal and there is no output schema, so result format is partially unstated; still, the combined definition gives an agent enough to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Every parameter already has a schema description, so the baseline is 3. The rule 'Include actual task context; use null for unknowns' adds cross-parameter guidance on how to fill the many optional context fields, which is genuinely useful beyond the schema and elevates the score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action and target: 'Super fast, semantic search across Mudpie’s public pages.' This clearly identifies the tool as the public-page search entry point and separates it from siblings like mudpie_ask_anything or mudpie_compare, though it never names an alternative explicitly, so it misses the top score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Semantic search across Mudpie’s public pages' implies the tool should be used when the agent needs to find public Mudpie content by meaning, and 'Include actual task context' gives invocation-level guidance. There is no explicit when-to-use versus the sibling tools such as mudpie_compare or mudpie_requirements_check, and no exclusion criteria, so the usage guidance is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Mudpie Public MCP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?