Skip to main content
Glama

Set pivot

set_pivot
Destructive

Set the rotation / scale pivot anchor for an image, video, shape, or text leaf. Picks one of the 9 standard bbox anchors — corners, edge midpoints, or centre — so the layer rotates and scales around that point instead of its centre. The pivot is normalized to the bbox, so resizing the layer keeps the pivot anchored to the same corner / edge / centre. Static (not animated). For groups, use move_layer with x/y to set the group's absolute pivotX/pivotY instead.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
anchorYesWhich of the 9 bbox anchors to pivot around. tl/t/tr = top row; l/c/r = middle row; bl/b/br = bottom row. c = centre (the default).
elementIdYesimage.<id>, video.<id>, shapes.<id>, or text.<id>.
projectIdYesOpaque project id (a v4 UUID, from list_projects/create_project). Selects which existing project this call mutates.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the call succeeded.
dataNoThe payload, shaped by the tool.
noteNoWhat to do next when not ready.
errorNoWhy it failed.
statusNoFor cache-backed readers: whether the answer was ready.
editorUrlNoOpens this project in the editor.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / anonymousToken
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "The token create_anonymous_account returned. This connection has no Morpha key, so every call carries it.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "elementId",
      -  "anchor",
      -  "projectId",
      -  "anonymousToken"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "elementId",
      +  "anchor",
      +  "projectId"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "description": "The result envelope every Morpha tool returns.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "The payload, shaped by the tool.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "object",
      +        "array",
      +        "string",
      +        "number",
      +        "boolean",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "editorUrl": {
      +      "description": "Opens this project in the editor.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Why it failed.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "description": "What to do next when not ready.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the call succeeded.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "description": "For cache-backed readers: whether the answer was ready.",
      +      "enum": [
      +        "ready",
      +        "not-ready"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / anonymousToken
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The token create_anonymous_account returned. This connection has no Morpha key, so every call carries it.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "elementId",
      -  "anchor",
      -  "projectId"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "elementId",
      +  "anchor",
      +  "projectId",
      +  "anonymousToken"
      +]
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already disclose mutability (readOnlyHint false, destructiveHint true), so the description's added value is the normalization behavior and the explicit 'Static (not animated)' note. It could also mention that calling this overwrites the existing pivot, but the destructive annotation plus 'Set' make that reasonably clear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three focused sentences with no filler. It front-loads the core purpose, then gives behavioral detail, and ends with a clear alternative for groups. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a three-parameter tool with a fully documented schema and an output schema, the description covers scope, behavior, and alternatives. An agent has everything needed to decide when to invoke it and what it will do.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents elementId, anchor, and projectId thoroughly. The description reinforces the anchor concept and adds the normalized-to-bbox behavior, but it does not add significant parameter-level details beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: it sets the rotation/scale pivot anchor for leaf layers (image, video, shape, text). It also distinguishes itself from move_layer by explicitly covering groups, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context for when to use this tool: for leaf layers, not groups, and for static (non-animated) pivot setting. It explicitly names move_layer as the alternative for groups, so an agent knows what not to use this tool for.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources