Skip to main content
Glama

Render status

render_status
Read-only

Check a server render started by render_video, and get its download link. Returns { ok: true, status: 'not-ready' } while it is still rendering (wait and call again), or { ok: true, status: 'ready', data: { downloadUrl, editorUrl, expiresAt, videoSeconds, scale } } once the MP4 is ready. downloadUrl is a plain https link needing no Morpha account — give it to the person; it stops working when the render is deleted at expiresAt (7 days). A render that failed answers ok:false with a plain reason and uses no allowance. Only the account that started a render can read it.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
renderIdYesThe renderId render_video returned.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the call succeeded.
dataNoThe payload, shaped by the tool.
noteNoWhat to do next when not ready.
errorNoWhy it failed.
statusNoFor cache-backed readers: whether the answer was ready.
editorUrlNoOpens this project in the editor.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / anonymousToken
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "The token create_anonymous_account returned. This connection has no Morpha key, so every call carries it.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "renderId",
      -  "anonymousToken"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "renderId"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "description": "The result envelope every Morpha tool returns.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "The payload, shaped by the tool.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "object",
      +        "array",
      +        "string",
      +        "number",
      +        "boolean",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "editorUrl": {
      +      "description": "Opens this project in the editor.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Why it failed.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "description": "What to do next when not ready.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the call succeeded.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "description": "For cache-backed readers: whether the answer was ready.",
      +      "enum": [
      +        "ready",
      +        "not-ready"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only cover the safety profile (readOnly, non-destructive, non-open-world); the description adds substantial behavioral context beyond them: the not-ready/ready envelope, the 7-day expiry that kills downloadUrl, that failed renders return ok:false with no allowance consumed, and that only the originating account can read the render.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the purpose, then the response shapes, then the operational caveats. Every sentence carries distinct information (polling, URL lifetime, failure semantics, ownership) with no repetition of the schema or annotations.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite an output schema existing, the description enumerates the return fields an agent must act on, and adds the non-obvious constraints (expiry, ownership, allowance-free failures) that the structured fields cannot express. Nothing needed to invoke or interpret the call is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter, and the schema already states renderId is what render_video returned, so the description adds no syntax, format, or constraint detail beyond it. Baseline 3 applies when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('check a server render started by render_video') and ties it directly to the sibling that produces the input. It also names the artifact obtained (download link / MP4), so an agent can distinguish it from render_video itself and from unrelated status tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear polling guidance: call again when status is 'not-ready', and describes the two terminal states. It does not mention an alternative or exclusion (e.g. the sibling clip_processing_status for non-render polling), so it stops just short of full when/when-not coverage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources