MorphaReels

Add from collection

add_from_collection

Add an item from the user's Collection into a project as a self-contained COPY. Pass the destination projectId, plus the sourceProjectId + elementId of an item from list_collection. Copies that layer (a whole group brings its children) plus its image/clip/font bytes into the destination at fresh ids and its original canvas position — fully detached, so it is immediately yours to edit and nothing links back to the source (deleting or changing the source never affects this copy). The element must actually be in the source project's collection and you must be able to read that project. An open editor on the destination picks the copy up within a few seconds — no refresh needed. Returns { addedElementId, count }.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "projectId": "<projectId>",
      "sourceProjectId": "<sourceProjectId>",
      "elementId": "<elementId>"
    },
    "name": "add_from_collection"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`elementId`	Yes	The item's element id (from list_collection) — any leaf or group.<id>.
`projectId`	Yes	Destination project the item is copied INTO.
`sourceProjectId`	Yes	The item's home project id (from list_collection).

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`ok`	Yes	Whether the call succeeded.
`data`	No	The payload, shaped by the tool.
`note`	No	What to do next when not ready.
`error`	No	Why it failed.
`status`	No	For cache-backed readers: whether the answer was ready.
`editorUrl`	No	Opens this project in the editor.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 17, 2026

removedInput schema / properties / anonymousToken

Removed value: -{
-  "description": "The token create_anonymous_account returned. This connection has no Morpha key, so every call carries it.",
-  "type": "string"
-}

changedInput schema / required

Previous value: -[
-  "projectId",
-  "sourceProjectId",
-  "elementId",
-  "anonymousToken"
-]New value: +[
+  "projectId",
+  "sourceProjectId",
+  "elementId"
+]

Changed1 schema field changedSep 15, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "description": "The result envelope every Morpha tool returns.",
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "description": "The payload, shaped by the tool.",
+      "type": [
+        "object",
+        "array",
+        "string",
+        "number",
+        "boolean",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "editorUrl": {
+      "description": "Opens this project in the editor.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "error": {
+      "description": "Why it failed.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "note": {
+      "description": "What to do next when not ready.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "ok": {
+      "description": "Whether the call succeeded.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "status": {
+      "description": "For cache-backed readers: whether the answer was ready.",
+      "enum": [
+        "ready",
+        "not-ready"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "ok"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 11, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / anonymousToken

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The token create_anonymous_account returned. This connection has no Morpha key, so every call carries it.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedInput schema / required

Previous value: -[
-  "projectId",
-  "sourceProjectId",
-  "elementId"
-]New value: +[
+  "projectId",
+  "sourceProjectId",
+  "elementId",
+  "anonymousToken"
+]

First observedSep 7, 2026

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description richly discloses behavior beyond annotations: it creates a fully detached copy with fresh ids, brings children with groups, carries image/clip/font bytes, preserves canvas position, and guarantees source deletions/changes never affect the copy. It also explains live-editor pickup behavior within seconds and the return value, giving the agent a complete mental model.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but every sentence carries unique, necessary information: core operation, parameter mapping, copy semantics, prerequisites, live pickup, and return shape. It is front-loaded with the primary purpose and maintains a logical flow without repetition or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with copy semantics, group behavior, detachment guarantees, and prerequisites, the description covers everything an agent needs to call it correctly: what ids to pass, what happens during the copy, what constraints exist, and what to expect in the response. An output schema exists, so return-value documentation is not a gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents all three parameters with 100% coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value by clarifying the roles of projectId (destination) versus sourceProjectId (home project), explicitly tying elementId to list_collection output, and reinforcing that fresh ids are generated.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: adding an item from the user's Collection into a project as a self-contained copy. It clearly distinguishes this from sibling tools like add_to_collection, which moves items into a collection, and list_collection, which lists collection items.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear invocation context: use list_collection to obtain sourceProjectId and elementId, and pass the destination projectId. It also states prerequisites (the element must be in the source project's collection and readable), though it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like add_to_collection or remove_from_collection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All MorphaReels tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?