Tailor a CV/resume to a specific job posting: rewrites the CV with the posting's ATS keywords (never fabricating skills not already present), and returns the tailored CV, a match score, role-fit notes and interview prep. Trial is rate-limited per IP; for unlimited use the user should sign up at maxcv.ai.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cvText | Yes | The full CV/resume as plain text. | |
| jobDescription | Yes | The job posting text. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description fully carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It explicitly states that skills are never fabricated, returns detailed outputs (tailored CV, match score, role-fit notes, interview prep), and discloses rate-limiting and sign-up requirement.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise—two sentences that efficiently cover purpose, deliverables, constraints, and call-to-action. Every sentence adds value without repetition or fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description explains what outputs are returned (tailored CV, match score, notes, prep) and the rule about not fabricating skills. Without an output schema, this provides sufficient context, though it could specify output format or score range.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes both parameters adequately. The description adds some context (e.g., 'rewrites the CV with ATS keywords') but does not significantly enhance the meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses the specific verb 'Tailor' and identifies the resource as 'CV/resume'. It clearly states the action (rewriting with ATS keywords) and distinguishes from sibling tool 'score_cv' by mentioning the deliverables (tailored CV, match score, notes, prep).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explains when to use the tool (tailoring a CV to a job posting) and notes rate-limiting for trial use. However, it does not explicitly contrast with the sibling tool 'score_cv' or state when not to use it, leaving some ambiguity.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a distinct, non-overlapping purpose: score_cv for assessment and gap analysis, tailor_cv for actual rewriting. No ambiguity.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores: score_cv and tailor_cv, making them predictable.
With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but still covers the core workflow of scoring and tailoring. Could potentially include a tool for resetting or managing CVs, but the count is appropriate for the narrow domain.
The tools cover the essential steps: assess the gap and then tailor. While there are no additional tools for viewing history or managing multiple CVs, the surface is sufficient for the stated purpose.