Skip to main content
Glama

Get image details

image_projects_retrieve_details
Read-only

MCP guidance:

  • Use this after a create tool to poll job status. When status is complete, surface the downloads URLs to the user; if status is error, surface the error message.

  • Each downloads[n].url is already the full signed download URL. Use it exactly as returned. Do not shorten it, strip query parameters, or append expires_at onto the URL string.

Check the progress of a image project. The downloads field is populated after a successful render.

Statuses

  • queued — waiting to start

  • rendering — in progress

  • complete — ready; see downloads

  • error — a failure occurred (see error)

  • canceled — user canceled

  • draft — not used

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesUnique ID of the image project. This value is returned by all of the POST APIs that create an image.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesUnique ID of the image. Use it with the [Get image Project API](https://docs.magichour.ai/api-reference/image-projects/get-image-details) to fetch status and downloads.
nameYesThe name of the image.
typeYesThe type of the image project. Possible values are FACE_EDITOR, AI_IMAGE_EDITOR, GENERATIVE_FILL, AI_SELFIE, AI_HEADSHOT, AI_INFLUENCER, AI_IMAGE, AI_MEME, CLOTHES_CHANGER, BACKGROUND_REMOVER, FACE_SWAP, IMAGE_UPSCALER, IMAGE_ENHANCER, AI_GIF, QR_CODE, PHOTO_EDITOR, PHOTO_COLORIZER, IMAGE_COLOR_GRADER, HEAD_SWAP, BODY_SWAP, STORYBOARD, IMAGE_EXPANDER
errorYesIn the case of an error, this object will contain the error encountered during video render
statusYesThe status of the image. - `draft` - the project was created but has not been submitted for rendering - `queued` - the job is waiting for an available server - `rendering` - the job is being processed; the `image.started` webhook event fires when rendering begins - `complete` - the job finished successfully; fires `image.completed` - `error` - the job failed during processing; fires `image.errored` - `canceled` - the job was manually canceled (for example from the Magic Hour web app) **Note:** `rendering`, `complete`, and `error` have matching webhook events; `canceled` does not - a canceled job emits no webhook event, so poll this endpoint to detect cancellation.
enabledYesWhether this resource is active. If false, it is deleted.
downloadsYes
created_atYes
image_countYesNumber of images generated
credits_chargedYesThe amount of credits deducted from your account to generate the image. We charge credits right when the request is made. If an error occurred while generating the image(s), credits will be refunded and this field will be updated to include the refund.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / context
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\"",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / type / description
      Previous value: -"The type of the image project. Possible values are FACE_EDITOR, AI_IMAGE_EDITOR, AI_SELFIE, AI_HEADSHOT, AI_INFLUENCER, AI_IMAGE, AI_MEME, CLOTHES_CHANGER, BACKGROUND_REMOVER, FACE_SWAP, IMAGE_UPSCALER, IMAGE_ENHANCER, AI_GIF, QR_CODE, PHOTO_EDITOR, PHOTO_COLORIZER, IMAGE_COLOR_GRADER, HEAD_SWAP, BODY_SWAP, STORYBOARD, IMAGE_EXPANDER"New value: +"The type of the image project. Possible values are FACE_EDITOR, AI_IMAGE_EDITOR, GENERATIVE_FILL, AI_SELFIE, AI_HEADSHOT, AI_INFLUENCER, AI_IMAGE, AI_MEME, CLOTHES_CHANGER, BACKGROUND_REMOVER, FACE_SWAP, IMAGE_UPSCALER, IMAGE_ENHANCER, AI_GIF, QR_CODE, PHOTO_EDITOR, PHOTO_COLORIZER, IMAGE_COLOR_GRADER, HEAD_SWAP, BODY_SWAP, STORYBOARD, IMAGE_EXPANDER"
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\"",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / type / description
      Previous value: -"The type of the image project. Possible values are FACE_EDITOR, AI_IMAGE_EDITOR, AI_SELFIE, AI_HEADSHOT, AI_INFLUENCER, AI_IMAGE, AI_MEME, CLOTHES_CHANGER, BACKGROUND_REMOVER, FACE_SWAP, IMAGE_UPSCALER, IMAGE_ENHANCER, AI_GIF, QR_CODE, PHOTO_EDITOR, PHOTO_COLORIZER, HEAD_SWAP, BODY_SWAP, STORYBOARD, IMAGE_EXPANDER"New value: +"The type of the image project. Possible values are FACE_EDITOR, AI_IMAGE_EDITOR, AI_SELFIE, AI_HEADSHOT, AI_INFLUENCER, AI_IMAGE, AI_MEME, CLOTHES_CHANGER, BACKGROUND_REMOVER, FACE_SWAP, IMAGE_UPSCALER, IMAGE_ENHANCER, AI_GIF, QR_CODE, PHOTO_EDITOR, PHOTO_COLORIZER, IMAGE_COLOR_GRADER, HEAD_SWAP, BODY_SWAP, STORYBOARD, IMAGE_EXPANDER"
  5. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this is a safe read (readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, openWorldHint=false). The description goes beyond that by explaining that `downloads` only populates after a successful render, enumerating all six statuses, and warning against mangling the signed URL (no shortening, no stripping query params, no appending expires_at). That is genuine behavioral value the annotations do not carry.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The operational guidance is front-loaded ahead of the prose, and each status bullet is a single line that earns its place for an agent branching on status. Minor waste: the title 'Get image details' is effectively restated by 'Check the progress of a image project', and the 'draft — not used' entry is dead weight.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-field documentation is not required, yet the description still supplies the status vocabulary and result-handling rules, which is the key missing piece in structured data. The one real gap is the unresolved relationship to wait_for_image_project, which an agent selecting among polling tools would need.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is a single required `id` parameter and schema description coverage is 100%, with the schema already explaining that the ID comes from the POST create APIs. The description adds no format, prefix, or sourcing detail beyond that, so the baseline of 3 is correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

It states a concrete verb and resource — 'Check the progress of a image project' — and the status enumeration makes the scope unambiguous. It distinguishes itself from create tools by framing itself as the post-create poll step, but it never names its closest sibling (wait_for_image_project), so an agent still has to infer which of the two polling tools to use.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The opening guidance gives an explicit trigger ('Use this after a create tool to poll job status') plus per-status follow-up actions: surface `downloads` on `complete`, surface the error on `error`. That is actionable usage context, but there is no explicit 'when not to use' and no named alternative such as wait_for_image_project.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources