Skip to main content
Glama

Face Swap Video

face_swap_create_video

What this API does

Create the same Face Swap you can make in the browser, but programmatically, so you can automate it, run it at scale, or connect it to your own app or workflow.

Good for

  • Automation and batch processing

  • Adding face swap into apps, pipelines, or tools

How it works (3 steps)

  1. Upload your inputs (video, image, or audio) with Generate Upload URLs and copy the file_path.

  2. Send a request to create a face swap job with the basic fields.

  3. Check the job status until it's complete, then download the result from downloads.

Key options

  • Inputs: usually a file, sometimes a YouTube link, depending on project type

  • Resolution: free users are limited to 576px; higher plans unlock HD and larger sizes

  • Extra fields: e.g. face_swap_mode, start_seconds/end_seconds, or a text prompt

Cost
Credits are only charged for the frames that actually render. You'll see an estimate when the job is queued, and the final total after it's done.

For detailed examples, see the product page.

MCP guidance:

  • This starts an async video generation job and returns id plus credits_charged immediately. If the user wants the finished result, call the wait_for_video_project helper with the returned id, or poll the matching GET /v1/video-projects/{id} endpoint until status is complete, error, or canceled. Completed projects include downloads with direct URLs. The custom wait helper also returns exact_download_urls separately from expiration metadata.

  • For *_file_path values, prefer an existing Magic Hour file path or a file_path returned by the upload-URL endpoint after the file bytes are uploaded. Direct public media URLs may work when they are stable, fetchable, and return raw file bytes, but hotlinked URLs can fail; when in doubt, use the presigned upload flow first and pass the returned file_path.

Use only with the user's own likeness or content they are authorized to use. Do not use for impersonation, deception, sexual content, or content involving minors.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoGive your video a custom name for easy identification.Face Swap - dateTime
styleNoStyle of the face swap video.
assetsYesProvide the assets for face swap. For video, The `video_source` field determines whether `video_file_path` or `youtube_url` field is used
end_secondsYesEnd time of your clip (seconds). Must be greater than start_seconds.
start_secondsYesStart time of your clip (seconds). Must be ≥ 0.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesUnique ID of the video. Use it with the [Get video Project API](https://docs.magichour.ai/api-reference/video-projects/get-video-details) to fetch status and downloads.
credits_chargedYesThe amount of credits deducted from your account to generate the video. If the status is not 'complete', this value is an estimate and may be adjusted upon completion based on the actual FPS of the output video. If video generation fails, credits will be refunded, and this field will be updated to include the refund.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / assets / properties / face_swap_mode / description
      Previous value: -"Choose how to swap faces:\n**all-faces** (recommended) — swap all detected faces using one source image (`source_file_path` required)\n+- **individual-faces** — specify exact mappings using `face_mappings`"New value: +"Choose how to swap faces:\n- **all-faces** (recommended) — swap all detected faces using one source image (`source_file_path` required)\n- **individual-faces** — specify exact mappings using `face_mappings`"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / context
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\"",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\"",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only say non-read-only, non-destructive, open-world; the description goes well beyond that by disclosing that the call is async and returns id + credits_charged immediately, that credits are charged per rendered frame, that free users are capped at 576px, and that hotlinked URLs may fail in favor of the presigned upload flow. It also states an authorization/consent constraint (own likeness only, no impersonation/minors).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is front-loaded with a clear 'what this does' header, but it is long for a tool description and repeats itself: the async/credits/wait-helper points appear both in the body and again under 'MCP guidance', and 'What this API does' opens with marketing framing rather than the operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex, nested, async generation tool with an output schema, the description covers the full lifecycle (upload -> create -> poll -> download), the credit model, and the wait helper, so nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing. Return-shape detail is rightly left to the output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is already 100%, so the baseline is 3; the description adds marginal but real value by naming the notable knobs (face_swap_mode, start_seconds/end_seconds, resolution) and by clarifying that *_file_path values should come from the upload-URL flow rather than arbitrary URLs. It does not resolve the ordering/validation rules between start_seconds and end_seconds beyond what the schema says.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('create the same Face Swap ... programmatically') and the medium (video), which cleanly separates it from the photo sibling face_swap_photo_create_image and from character_replace_create_video. An agent can identify what this produces without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'Good for' section gives context (automation, batch processing, embedding in apps/pipelines) and the MCP guidance routes follow-up work explicitly to wait_for_video_project or the GET endpoint. It does not, however, contrast itself against other video-creation siblings, so the alternative-selection guidance is implicit rather than stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources