Skip to main content
Glama

Loafy: Sourdough Bread Baking

My Loafy containers

list_my_containers
Read-onlyIdempotent

The baker's own containers in Loafy: name and empty weight in grams, which Loafy takes off when dough is weighed in them, with notes, each with its id and a link. A new container is add_container, a change to one is update_container. Needs the baker's Loafy account.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_my_containers"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlNoThe same answer, recipe or entry on loafy.ai.
noteNoA remark on the whole result, such as why nothing was found.
toolNoThe tool that answered.
inputNoThe arguments as the tool used them, after any correction.
notesNoWhat was corrected or left out, such as a value outside its range.
containersNoBy name.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "description": "The baker's containers.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "containers": {
      +      "description": "By name.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "description": "One of the baker's containers.",
      +        "properties": {
      +          "id": {
      +            "description": "The container's id, which update_container takes.",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "name": {
      +            "description": "Its name.",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "notes": {
      +            "description": "Notes on it.",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "url": {
      +            "description": "The container on loafy.ai.",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "weight_grams": {
      +            "description": "Its empty weight, in grams.",
      +            "type": "number"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "input": {
      +      "description": "The arguments as the tool used them, after any correction.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "description": "A remark on the whole result, such as why nothing was found.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "notes": {
      +      "description": "What was corrected or left out, such as a value outside its range.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "description": "A correction or remark.",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The tool that answered.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "url": {
      +      "description": "The same answer, recipe or entry on loafy.ai.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false. The description adds real context beyond them: the empty-weight tare semantics ('which Loafy takes off when dough is weighed in them') and the account prerequisite.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Compact at three sentences, with the resource and its fields leading before the sibling routing and the auth note. The first sentence is dense and slightly run-on, but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return structure need not be restated; the description still covers purpose, sibling routing, tare behavior, and the Loafy-account requirement. No notable gap remains for a parameterless read tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description uses the space to characterize the returned record shape (id, link, notes, weight in grams), which is useful even though an output schema exists.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific resource ('the baker's own containers in Loafy') and enumerates the payload fields (name, empty weight in grams, notes, id, link). It is clearly distinguishable from list_my_bakes and list_my_starters by both scope and content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes related operations: 'A new container is add_container, a change to one is update_container.' That covers the create/update alternatives, but there is no statement of when this list is the right call versus other list tools or any exclusion condition.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources