Skip to main content
Glama

Local business leads with checked emails (paid, $0.03 a lead)

leads_search
Read-only

PAID over x402 inside this tool call (USDC on Base or Arc, $0.03 per lead returned, flat, with or without an email; default 3 leads = $0.09; set sample=true for 3 free leads first; the PaymentRequired quotes the exact total; no leads, no charge): local businesses by category and place with a graded email (A/B/C), a contact name when the email shows one, phone, website, socials and buying signals (no website, booking tool, payment system, hiring). Call once without payment to get the x402 PaymentRequired, then call again with the signed payment in _meta["x402/payment"].

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
zipNo5-digit ZIP (a prefix works).
cityNoCity, e.g. Atlanta, Savannah, Macon. Give city, county, zip or near.
nearNolat,lng to search around.
emailNorequired (default), any, or none (phone-only businesses).
limitNoHow many leads, 1-1,000 (default 3 = $0.09); $0.03 per lead.
countyNoCounty, e.g. Gwinnett, Chatham.
hiringNoOnly businesses whose site says they are hiring.
offsetNoSkip this many, for the next page.
sampleNotrue = 3 free leads to judge quality (3 a day), no payment.
bookingNoOnline booking tool: yes, none, vagaro, square_appointments, calendly, booksy, mindbody, acuity, opentable, housecall_pro, jobber, servicetitan, zocdoc.
websiteNoneeds = no working website (a sales signal).
categoryYesBusiness type in plain words: dentist, plumber, hvac, roofing, hair salon, law firm, med spa, restaurant.
minGradeNoEmail grade floor (A best). Default C.
paymentsNoPayment system on their site: yes, none, square, toast, clover, stripe, paypal.
radiusKmNoRadius for near, default 5.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nextNoURL of the next page
countNoLeads returned
leadsNoEach lead: name, category, address, phone, website, websiteProof, email with grade, contact, socials, signals, listing
queryNoThe search as understood
checksNoHow leads are checked
gradesNoWhat each email grade means
sampleNotrue when this was the free sample
sourceNoData sources
priceUsdNoPrice of this call in USD

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "properties": {
      +    "checks": {
      +      "description": "How leads are checked",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "count": {
      +      "description": "Leads returned",
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "grades": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "What each email grade means",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "leads": {
      +      "description": "Each lead: name, category, address, phone, website, websiteProof, email with grade, contact, socials, signals, listing",
      +      "items": {},
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "next": {
      +      "description": "URL of the next page",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "priceUsd": {
      +      "description": "Price of this call in USD",
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "query": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "The search as understood",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "sample": {
      +      "description": "true when this was the free sample",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "Data sources",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"How many leads, 1-1,000 (default 10 = $0.30); $0.03 per lead."New value: +"How many leads, 1-1,000 (default 3 = $0.09); $0.03 per lead."
    • addedInput schema / properties / sample
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "true = 3 free leads to judge quality (3 a day), no payment.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"How many leads, 1-1,000 (default 10 = $0.10); 100+ and 500+ per call cost less per lead."New value: +"How many leads, 1-1,000 (default 10 = $0.30); $0.03 per lead."
  4. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / key
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Your Liquid Leads plan key: plan leads are free, past the quota the overage pays per lead.",
      -  "pattern": "^ll_[A-Za-z0-9]{32}$",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"How many leads, 1-100 (default 25)."New value: +"How many leads, 1-1,000 (default 10 = $0.10); 100+ and 500+ per call cost less per lead."
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / maximum
      Previous value: -100New value: +1000
  5. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Extensive disclosure beyond the annotations: flat $0.03 per lead regardless of email presence, default 3 leads = $0.09, sample limited to 3 free leads per day, 'no leads, no charge', and the two-call x402 handshake. readOnlyHint=true remains consistent since no data is mutated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the cost model in capitals so the agent sees 'PAID' immediately, then packs the payment flow and payload description into two dense sentences. The parenthetical is long but every clause carries pricing or workflow information rather than filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 15-parameter, paid, open-world tool with an output schema, the description covers the payment lifecycle and the shape of returned leads, which is what an agent needs before calling. It leaves unspecified the relative scope versus the other leads_* siblings, a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is already 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaning the schema lacks: the pricing consequence of limit ('default 3 = $0.09; $0.03 per lead'), the purpose of sample, and the semantics of minGrade and buying-signal filters framed as sales signals rather than raw fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource – returning local businesses by category and place with graded emails (A/B/C), contact name, phone, website, socials and buying signals. It is distinguishable from sibling leads tools (leads_lookup, leads_count, leads_tech) by its explicit email-grade and signal payload.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete invocation guidance: set sample=true for 3 free leads first, then call once without payment to receive the x402 PaymentRequired and call again with the signed payment in _meta["x402/payment"]. It does not, however, say when to prefer this over sibling leads_lookup or leads_tech.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.