--deprecated

This connector has been deprecated

Replaced by io.github.no-fait/infinite-audience

Get Match Run

get_match_run

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a single micro-batch match run by its run_id. Returns full details: match_count, match_rate, input_record_count, estimated subscription capacity consumption in USD, field_list, status, created_at, expires_at. Requires 'discovery' scope.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "run_id": "<run_id>"
    },
    "name": "get_match_run"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`run_id`	Yes	The match run ID returned by list_match_runs or a prior match_records call

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`run_id`	Yes
`status`	Yes
`guidance`	No	Interpretation or recovery guidance for this result
`count_unit`	No
`page_count`	No	Number of objects on this page, not the organization total
`count_state`	No	Unknown means no count; available does not guarantee freshness. Recount for a current value.
`match_count`	Yes
`next_actions`	No	Suggested next calls using returned IDs and available scopes. Not executed and not user consent.
`population_input`	No	Population input used for the preview; IDs refer to their current saved definitions
`input_record_count`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedNov 6, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": {},
+  "properties": {
+    "count_state": {
+      "description": "Unknown means no count; available does not guarantee freshness. Recount for a current value.",
+      "enum": [
+        "unknown",
+        "available"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "count_unit": {
+      "const": "records",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "guidance": {
+      "description": "Interpretation or recovery guidance for this result",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "input_record_count": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "match_count": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "next_actions": {
+      "description": "Suggested next calls using returned IDs and available scopes. Not executed and not user consent.",
+      "items": {
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "properties": {
+          "arguments": {
+            "additionalProperties": {},
+            "propertyNames": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          "reason": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "tool": {
+            "type": "string"
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "tool",
+          "arguments",
+          "reason"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "page_count": {
+      "description": "Number of objects on this page, not the organization total",
+      "maximum": 9007199254740991,
+      "minimum": -9007199254740991,
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    "population_input": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Population input used for the preview; IDs refer to their current saved definitions",
+      "propertyNames": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "run_id": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "status": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "run_id",
+    "status",
+    "input_record_count",
+    "match_count"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedSep 24, 2026

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real value with the required 'discovery' scope and the billing-relevant detail that returned figures include estimated subscription capacity consumption in USD, but says nothing about expiry behavior despite listing expires_at.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core action, followed by one dense sentence of return fields and one short prerequisite sentence. The field enumeration is long but each item is substantively different information for an agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers the action, the identifier, the required scope, and the shape of the result; with an output schema present, enumerating the fields is extra rather than mandatory. Only the absence of guidance relative to list_match_runs and match_records keeps it from a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single run_id parameter is fully documented in the schema, so the baseline applies. The description adds no format, provenance, or validity rules for run_id beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Retrieve a single micro-batch match run by its run_id'), which is clearly distinct from list-oriented siblings such as list_match_runs. It stops short of explicitly naming those siblings as alternatives, so it lands just below the top mark.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies lookup-by-identifier usage but never says when to prefer it over list_match_runs or match_records; the only routing hint (run_id comes from list_match_runs or a prior match_records call) lives in the schema, not the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All --deprecated tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?