Skip to main content
Glama
This connector has been deprecated

Replaced by io.github.no-fait/infinite-audience

Get File Match Job

get_file_match_job
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a single file-based identity resolution job by its match_id (= segment_id). Returns full details including matching_status, file_format, compression, field_counts, source_job_id, audience_id, audience_status, and error_message if failed. Matching capacity consumption is reported after the first successful delivery. Its monetary estimate is denominated in USD and covers the matching component separately from delivery. audience_status (active/archived/null) reports whether the linked audience is still open-able in Library. mapping_warnings lists problems with how the file's columns were used (code nested_addresses means the addresses column was ignored in whole or part) — tell the user about any entries. Use to check job progress after create_segment(subtype=matched), or to retrieve the audience_id for delivery. Requires 'discovery' scope.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "match_id": "<match_id>"
    },
    "name": "get_file_match_job"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
match_idYesThe match_id (segment_id) returned by create_segment(subtype=matched) or list_file_match_jobs

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
statusYes
guidanceNoInterpretation or recovery guidance for this result
match_idYes
count_unitNo
page_countNoNumber of objects on this page, not the organization total
count_stateNoUnknown means no count; available does not guarantee freshness. Recount for a current value.
next_actionsNoSuggested next calls using returned IDs and available scopes. Not executed and not user consent.
population_inputNoPopulation input used for the preview; IDs refer to their current saved definitions

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "properties": {
      +    "count_state": {
      +      "description": "Unknown means no count; available does not guarantee freshness. Recount for a current value.",
      +      "enum": [
      +        "unknown",
      +        "available"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "count_unit": {
      +      "const": "records",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "guidance": {
      +      "description": "Interpretation or recovery guidance for this result",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "match_id": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "next_actions": {
      +      "description": "Suggested next calls using returned IDs and available scopes. Not executed and not user consent.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": false,
      +        "properties": {
      +          "arguments": {
      +            "additionalProperties": {},
      +            "propertyNames": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "reason": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "tool": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "tool",
      +          "arguments",
      +          "reason"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "page_count": {
      +      "description": "Number of objects on this page, not the organization total",
      +      "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +      "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "population_input": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Population input used for the preview; IDs refer to their current saved definitions",
      +      "propertyNames": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "match_id",
      +    "status"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/idempotent annotations, it discloses the 'discovery' scope requirement, that capacity consumption appears only after the first successful delivery, that the monetary estimate is USD and covers matching separately from delivery, and how to interpret audience_status and mapping_warnings codes. That is material behavior an agent could not infer from the annotations or schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is front-loaded with purpose and usage, then tucks return-field and semantics detail afterward; nearly every clause carries information. The monetary-estimate sentence is the weakest, being tangential to a job-status fetch, but it is not wasteful enough to hurt.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a single required param, full schema coverage, an output schema, and read-only annotations, the definition still covers auth scope, error_message presence, warning-code interpretation, and downstream ID usage. Nothing needed to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single parameter is already documented, but the description adds the non-obvious equivalence match_id = segment_id, which helps an agent reconcile IDs across sibling tools like get_segment.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource ('Retrieve a single file-based identity resolution job') and names the lookup key, distinguishing it from the sibling list_file_match_jobs by emphasizing 'single'. An agent can tell immediately what it returns.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states two concrete use cases — checking progress after create_segment(subtype=matched) and retrieving the audience_id for delivery — which routes the agent correctly. It stops short of saying when to use list_file_match_jobs instead of this single-job fetch, so there is no explicit exclusion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources