Skip to main content
Glama

Gondola Award Travel Search

get_booking

Read-only

Get details for a hotel booking made through Gondola, using the Gondola booking ID shown as "Gondola booking" by get_upcoming_trips and get_past_trips. Returns hotel name, dates, room type, rate, status, and cancellation policy. A hotel or airline confirmation number will not resolve. Reservations Gondola imported from email have no Gondola booking ID; get_upcoming_trips and get_past_trips already return their full detail, so answer from those instead of calling this.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
booking_idYesThe Gondola booking ID, as shown by get_upcoming_trips or get_past_trips. Not a hotel or provider confirmation number.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / booking_id / description
      Previous value: -"The booking ID or confirmation number."New value: +"The Gondola booking ID, as shown by get_upcoming_trips or get_past_trips. Not a hotel or provider confirmation number."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "result": {
      +      "title": "Result",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "result"
      +  ],
      +  "title": "get_bookingOutput",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / booking_id / description
      Added value: +"The booking ID or confirmation number."
    • removedInput schema / properties / booking_id / title
      Removed value: -"Booking Id"
    • removedInput schema / title
      Removed value: -"get_bookingArguments"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "properties": {
      -    "result": {
      -      "title": "Result",
      -      "type": "string"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "required": [
      -    "result"
      -  ],
      -  "title": "get_bookingOutput",
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint true and destructiveHint false; the description adds important behavior beyond that: alternate confirmation numbers will not resolve, and imported email reservations lack IDs. This prevents failed calls and instructs fallback behavior, giving the agent a clear model of what the tool can and cannot do.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is four sentences but each sentence earns its place: what it does, what it returns, what it won't resolve, and when to use an alternative. It is front-loaded with the core purpose and contains no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read-only tool with an output schema, the description covers the full decision space: source of the ID, expected output, failure conditions, and fallback tool. An agent has everything needed to decide whether to call this tool and how to pass the parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents booking_id at 100% coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds practical meaning by naming the exact display label 'Gondola booking', excluding hotel/airline confirmation numbers, and clarifying that email-imported reservations have no booking ID. These constraints go beyond the bare schema text.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Get details for a hotel booking made through Gondola.' It enumerates the returned fields (hotel name, dates, room type, rate, status, cancellation policy) and clearly scopes the tool to Gondola bookings, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_booking_link and get_vehicle_booking.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly tells the agent when to use it: with the Gondola booking ID shown by get_upcoming_trips and get_past_trips. It also gives strong when-not-to-use guidance: confirmation numbers will not resolve, and email-imported reservations have no Gondola booking ID, so the agent should answer from get_upcoming_trips/get_past_trips instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.