Gogi

Deactivate Algorithm

deactivate_algo

Deactivate and unlink an algorithm from a trading instance, stopping that linked strategy without deleting the saved algorithm. Use this before delete_algo; it is reversible with activate_algo, but inspect open positions first because deactivation does not automatically flatten broker exposure.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`algo_id`	Yes	ID of the algorithm
`instance_id`	Yes	ID of the trading instance

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`error`	No
`message`	No
`success`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 13, 2026

changedOutput schema / description

Previous value: -"Structured Gogi result. Error responses include error and message fields."New value: +"Structured result. Error responses include error and message."

addedOutput schema / properties

Added value: +{
+  "error": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "message": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "success": {
+    "type": "boolean"
+  }
+}

Changed1 schema field changedSep 13, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "Structured Gogi result. Error responses include error and message fields.",
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedSep 13, 2026

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare the safety profile (destructiveHint false, idempotentHint false); the description adds behavior they cannot express: the saved algorithm is preserved, the action is reversible, and deactivation does not flatten broker exposure. That last point is a high-value operational caveat.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One dense sentence with the core action front-loaded, followed by sequencing, reversibility, and risk in a logical order. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need not be described. Purpose, sibling routing, reversal path, and the exposure caveat are all present, leaving nothing an agent needs to call this correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and both params (algo_id, instance_id) are documented in the schema. The description adds no further meaning about the identifier semantics or constraints, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb pair (deactivate and unlink), names the resource (algorithm) and scope (from a trading instance), and clarifies the non-deletion semantics that distinguish it from delete_algo. An agent can differentiate it from siblings without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly sequences the tool relative to siblings ('Use this before delete_algo'), names the reversal path (activate_algo), and gives a precondition warning (inspect open positions first). Both when-to-use and the alternative are covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Gogi tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?