Skip to main content
Glama

list_broadcasts

Read-only

List broadcasts in the application with status, schedule, and delivery counts. Read-only. Filters combine as AND. Note that delivery counts report messages attempted, not confirmed deliveries. Use get_broadcast_details for one broadcast's full breakdown. To CREATE or SEND a broadcast use apply_actions: create_broadcast makes a draft, update_broadcast (status SCHEDULED) schedules/sends it — see get_action_schema under broadcasts.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page number. Defaults to 1.
botIdNoOnly broadcasts belonging to this bot. Omit for all bots in the application.
limitNoBroadcasts per page, between 1 and 100.
statusNoOnly broadcasts in this lifecycle state. Omit for all states.
isRecurringNoTrue for recurring broadcasts only, false for one-off only. Omit for both.
applicationIdNoApplication (workspace) id. Optional: an application-scoped key (app_...) defaults to its own application, but a personal key (usr_...) has no default and omitting it fails with MCP_APPLICATION_REQUIRED. Call list_applications to get the id.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, and the description redundantly states 'Read-only.' However, it adds valuable behavioral nuances beyond annotations: 'delivery counts report messages attempted, not confirmed deliveries' and 'Filters combine as AND.' This enriches the agent's understanding of output semantics and filtering behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded with the core purpose, then adds necessary caveats and alternative-tool pointers. Each sentence serves a distinct function; even the redundant 'Read-only' is a single short word after the primary purpose. No fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a list tool with no output schema, the description conveys the expected response shape ('status, schedule, and delivery counts') and warns about delivery-count semantics. It does not detail pagination structure, but the schema's limit/page parameters and high overall coverage make this acceptable. The cross-references to related tools make it complete for selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds the crucial interaction 'Filters combine as AND,' which is not explicitly present in any single parameter description. It also clarifies that delivery counts refer to attempts, helping interpret parameters like status. This exceeds baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'List broadcasts in the application with status, schedule, and delivery counts.' It also distinguishes from sibling tools by directing users to get_broadcast_details for a single broadcast's full breakdown, making it clear what this tool does not do.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use guidance: lists broadcasts with filters combined as AND, and clearly names alternatives: 'Use get_broadcast_details for one broadcast's full breakdown' and 'To CREATE or SEND a broadcast use apply_actions... see get_action_schema under broadcasts.' This gives the agent a clear decision tree.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Each get_/list_ tool targets a distinct resource and the descriptions carefully separate similar pairs like get_application_context vs get_workspace_summary and get_broadcast_details vs get_broadcast_analytics. The main ambiguity is apply_actions vs validate_actions, since one runs the other's validation, but the descriptions make that relationship explicit.

Naming Consistency4/5

Names consistently follow verb_object snake_case and use familiar verbs like create, get, list, and update. Minor deviations such as read_messages instead of list_messages, apply_actions/validate_actions with plural nouns, and run_flow_autotest are still predictable and readable.

Tool Count2/5

33 tools exceeds the 25-tool threshold and makes the surface feel heavy, even though the domain is broad. Many of the read-only getters are individually useful but could be consolidated, such as merging module catalog/details or workspace/application context.

Completeness4/5

Core workflows are covered: application lifecycle, flow editing through apply_actions, deployment, contacts, broadcasts, modules, and message/event reads. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated delete for contacts, applications, or broadcasts, and no rollback for deployments, but agents can work around or avoid these.