Skip to main content
Glama

devtune_list_library

Read-onlyIdempotent

List project Library items. Current versions are returned by default.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "devtune_list_library"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoResults per page.
cursorNoOpaque cursor from the previous response.
pageSizeNoThe same setting as limit. Send either.
includeSupersededNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Results per page."
    • addedInput schema / properties / pageSize
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/limit",
      +  "description": "The same setting as limit. Send either."
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and non-destructive. The description adds one useful behavioral fact beyond them: superseded versions are excluded by default. It says nothing about ordering, pagination behavior, or what a page of results contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded, with no filler. It could have been slightly more informative in the same space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A simple read-only list tool with annotations and a documented schema needs limited prose, and this covers the essential default. However, with no output schema, the description leaves the agent without any sense of result shape, ordering, or how pagination terminates.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 75% and the schema itself explains limit/cursor/pageSize. The one undocumented parameter, includeSuperseded, has its semantics supplied by the description's 'current versions are returned by default', which is real added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'List project Library items'. It is clear what the tool returns, but it does not distinguish itself from the closely related sibling devtune_search_library, so an agent must infer the difference.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance and no mention of alternatives such as devtune_search_library (find by query) or devtune_read_library_item (fetch one item). The agent must guess which sibling to pick.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources