Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds useful behavioral context beyond annotations: the URL is temporary and only exists after the setup job is COMPLETED. It stops short of describing URL expiry timing or error behavior when the precondition fails.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with zero waste. The core action is front-loaded, and the critical precondition follows immediately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the key lifecycle precondition is covered. However, the meaning of the two required parameters is missing from both the schema and description, and failure behavior when the setup job is incomplete is unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the schema does not explain project_id or website_id. The description only vaguely implies a website context and says nothing about what project_id selects or how the two IDs relate. With two required parameters and no schema descriptions, the description should compensate but does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Get a temporary URL of the sample products file of a website.' This clearly identifies the tool's output and differentiates it from generic export or URL-results siblings. It could be slightly stronger by explicitly naming which sibling to use instead for other file types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a clear precondition: 'The sample exists after the setup job of the website is COMPLETED.' This tells the agent when the tool is usable, but it does not mention alternatives or what to do when the job is not complete.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.