Skip to main content
Glama

Create, update, and delete follow-up tasks (action items) tied to meetings. Use this for action-item lifecycle; to manage the parent meeting, agenda, or participants, use those dedicated tools. Set `action` to one of: create, delete, update. Then provide the fields for the selected action. action=create: Add a follow-up task to a meeting. Use this when the user wants to track work that came out of a meeting. Creates a follow-up action item in an accessible meeting. `meeting_id` and `title` are required; unknown `meeting_id` returns 404. Optional `status` must be one of `needs_review`, `accepted`, `in_progress`, `blocked`, `completed`, `cancelled`. The 201 body returns the `id` for v1UpdateActionItem or v1DeleteActionItem. Idempotent with `Idempotency-Key`; blind retries can duplicate without it. action=delete: Remove a follow-up task. Use this when the user wants to delete an action item. Soft-deletes an action item keyed by `{id}`. Returns 204 with no body. Unknown or inaccessible ids return 404. The call is effectively idempotent: a second delete of the same id also 404s, so retries are safe. action=update: Change a follow-up task's status or details. Use this when the user wants to update an action item. Partial update (PATCH) — only send fields to change. `status` drives a state machine, so set it explicitly rather than inferring from `is_completed`. This call does NOT honor `Idempotency-Key`; a blind retry may apply the same change twice. Returns 404 for an unknown or inaccessible id.

manageActionItems
Destructive

Create, update, and delete follow-up tasks (action items) tied to meetings. Use this for action-item lifecycle; to manage the parent meeting, agenda, or participants, use those dedicated tools.

Set action to one of: create, delete, update. Then provide the fields for the selected action.

action=create: Add a follow-up task to a meeting. Use this when the user wants to track work that came out of a meeting.

Creates a follow-up action item in an accessible meeting. meeting_id and title are required; unknown meeting_id returns 404. Optional status must be one of needs_review, accepted, in_progress, blocked, completed, cancelled. The 201 body returns the id for v1UpdateActionItem or v1DeleteActionItem. Idempotent with Idempotency-Key; blind retries can duplicate without it.

action=delete: Remove a follow-up task. Use this when the user wants to delete an action item.

Soft-deletes an action item keyed by {id}. Returns 204 with no body. Unknown or inaccessible ids return 404. The call is effectively idempotent: a second delete of the same id also 404s, so retries are safe.

action=update: Change a follow-up task's status or details. Use this when the user wants to update an action item.

Partial update (PATCH) — only send fields to change. status drives a state machine, so set it explicitly rather than inferring from is_completed. This call does NOT honor Idempotency-Key; a blind retry may apply the same change twice. Returns 404 for an unknown or inaccessible id.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoAction Item ID
titleNoShort summary of the work to be done (1-1000 characters)
actionYesThe operation to perform
statusNoWorkflow status: needs_review, accepted, in_progress, blocked, completed or cancelled. Defaults to needs_review
due_dateNoDate the action item is due, as YYYY-MM-DD
meeting_idNoID of the meeting the action item belongs to
descriptionNoLonger description of the action item, in Markdown (max 1000 characters)
is_completedNoMarks the action item completed (true) or reopens it (false); a convenience alias for status
Idempotency-KeyNoOptional client-generated idempotency key (max 255 printable ASCII). Repeat requests with the same key replay the original 2xx response.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds rich behavioral details beyond annotations: for create, it mentions idempotency via Idempotency-Key and risk of duplicates on blind retries; for delete, it explains soft-delete behavior and 404 on second attempt; for update, it notes partial update, state machine, and lack of idempotency. This context is critical for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections for each action and front-loaded purpose. It is somewhat verbose but remains organized and easy to navigate. Minor trimming could improve conciseness without losing clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having no output schema, the description covers all three actions, required parameters, error responses (404, 204, 201), idempotency behavior, and status state machine. It provides sufficient context for an agent to call the tool correctly in all scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema coverage, baseline is 3. The description adds meaning by explaining conditional requirements (e.g., meeting_id and title required for create), the role of the action parameter, and the idempotency key's effect. It does not repeat all parameters but provides actionable context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tautological: description restates name/title.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear when-to-use guidance for each action (e.g., 'Use this when the user wants to track work that came out of a meeting') and references alternatives. However, it does not explicitly list exclusions beyond the initial sibling differentiation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are mostly distinct, with clear separation between meetings, agenda/backlog items, action items, participants, and calendar events. However, `manageMeetingContent` bundles both raw file attachments and AI context documents into one tool, which could cause confusion for an agent deciding which contentType variant to use.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., `listMeetings`, `getMeeting`, `deleteUserToken`), but there are minor deviations like `manageMeetingItems` (verb_noun) vs `manageActionItems` (verb_noun) and `getMeetingTranscript` which is consistent, but `getMe` breaks the pattern as a short form. Overall, predictable and well-organized.

Tool Count4/5

With 30 tools, the count is on the higher side but reasonable given the broad domain covering meetings, agenda, backlogs, action items, participants, calendar events, user tokens, and content management. Each tool serves a specific purpose, though a slight reduction by combining some closely related functions could improve focus.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the core lifecycle for meetings, agenda/backlog items, action items, participants, and content management. Minor gaps exist, such as the lack of tools for managing meeting templates (only listed, not created/deleted) and no tool for sending invitations via email, but these are not critical for the main use cases.

Resources