Skip to main content
Glama

Cirra AI Salesforce Admin MCP Server

user_update

Idempotent

Update a Salesforce user, including activating, deactivating, freezing, unfreezing, resetting passwords, or modifying user properties

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
userYesThe id, username, full name or email of the user to update
sf_userNo(optional) Salesforce username to identify the connection to use. Omit this to use the current default connection.
operationYesThe type of operation to perform. Can be one of: - `deactivate`: To deactivate a user - `activate`: To activate a user - `reset_password`: To reset password of a user. An email to reset password will be sent to the user's email - `freeze`: To freeze a user - `unfreeze`: To unfreeze a user - `unlock_password`: To unlock password for a user - `update`
propertiesNoThe properties to update when choosing the `update` operation
cirra_ai_teamNo(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit it when this call carries the context_handle from cirra_ai_init, which names the team for the conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either the context_handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'.
context_handleNo(recommended) The conversation context handle returned by cirra_ai_init in this conversation. Pass the exact context_handle value from the most recent cirra_ai_init result so this call runs against the team and Salesforce connection selected for this conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several Cirra AI teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either this handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'; a call with neither is refused.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
messageYes
resultsNo
successYes
warningNo
errorCodeNo
errorCountNo
resultCountNo
artifactTypeNo
requestCountNo
skippedCountNo
successCountNo
artifactCategoryNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / cirra_ai_team / description
      Previous value: -"(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit to use your current/default team."New value: +"(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit it when this call carries the context_handle from cirra_ai_init, which names the team for the conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either the context_handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'."
    • addedInput schema / properties / context_handle
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "(recommended) The conversation context handle returned by cirra_ai_init in this conversation. Pass the exact context_handle value from the most recent cirra_ai_init result so this call runs against the team and Salesforce connection selected for this conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several Cirra AI teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either this handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'; a call with neither is refused.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "artifactCategory": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "artifactType": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "errorCode": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "errorCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "requestCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "resultCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "results": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": true,
      +        "properties": {},
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "skippedCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "successCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "warning": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success",
      +    "message"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cirra_ai_team
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit to use your current/default team.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Added
  4. Removed
  5. Added
  6. Removed
  7. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / properties / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -{}New value: +true
  8. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=true, openWorldHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds nothing beyond that: it does not mention that reset_password sends an email, that deactivation affects login/ownership, or what permissions are needed — even though it claims operations at least as consequential as those hints imply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence that names the resource first and then the operations. No filler, though the long inline enumeration duplicates what the enum already lists.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and the input schema is fully documented, so return values and parameters are covered elsewhere. What the description omits is behavioral context for a multi-mode mutation tool: which modes are reversible, whether an admin profile is required, and any preconditions before freezing or resetting a password.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the enum documents each operation individually, including the email side effect of reset_password. The description only restates the operation set and gestures at 'user properties', adding no syntax or constraints beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("Update a Salesforce user") and enumerates the concrete operations covered: activate, deactivate, freeze, unfreeze, reset password, modify properties. This clearly separates it from user_create and user_describe, though no sibling is named explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to choose this tool versus alternatives (e.g. sobject_update for generic objects, user_describe first to look up a user), and no prerequisites such as required admin permissions or the fact that deactivating yourself is typically blocked. The agent must infer all of this from the enum.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources