Skip to main content
Glama

Cirra AI Salesforce Admin MCP Server

user_describe

Read-onlyIdempotent

Return complete metadata for a Salesforce user

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
userYesThe name, username, email or ID of the user
sf_userNo(optional) Salesforce username to identify the connection to use. Omit this to use the current default connection.
cirra_ai_teamNo(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit it when this call carries the context_handle from cirra_ai_init, which names the team for the conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either the context_handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'.
context_handleNo(recommended) The conversation context handle returned by cirra_ai_init in this conversation. Pass the exact context_handle value from the most recent cirra_ai_init result so this call runs against the team and Salesforce connection selected for this conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several Cirra AI teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either this handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'; a call with neither is refused.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
messageYes
resultsNo
successYes
warningNo
errorCodeNo
errorCountNo
resultCountNo
artifactTypeNo
requestCountNo
skippedCountNo
successCountNo
artifactCategoryNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / cirra_ai_team / description
      Previous value: -"(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit to use your current/default team."New value: +"(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit it when this call carries the context_handle from cirra_ai_init, which names the team for the conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either the context_handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'."
    • addedInput schema / properties / context_handle
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "(recommended) The conversation context handle returned by cirra_ai_init in this conversation. Pass the exact context_handle value from the most recent cirra_ai_init result so this call runs against the team and Salesforce connection selected for this conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several Cirra AI teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either this handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'; a call with neither is refused.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "artifactCategory": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "artifactType": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "errorCode": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "errorCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "requestCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "resultCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "results": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": true,
      +        "properties": {},
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "skippedCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "successCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "warning": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success",
      +    "message"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cirra_ai_team
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit to use your current/default team.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Added
  4. Removed
  5. Added
  6. Removed
  7. First observed

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is fully covered. The description adds only the qualifier 'complete', which signals a full record rather than a summary, but says nothing about what metadata is included or how connection resolution affects the result.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with zero filler. It is arguably undersized given the connection-resolution complexity, but nothing in it is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the schema fully documents the connection/team parameters. However, the description never signals that a context_handle or team+user pair may be mandatory, which is the main failure mode for this call — the agent only learns that by reading the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the four parameters are documented in detail, including the context_handle vs. cirra_ai_team + sf_user requirement. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Return complete metadata for a Salesforce user'), which cleanly separates it from the sibling mutators user_create/user_update and from object-level describers like sobject_describe. It stops short of explicitly naming a sibling or scope boundary, so it is clear but not maximally differentiating.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and names no alternatives. An agent must infer from the name alone that this is the lookup to run before user_update or when user details are needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources