Skip to main content
Glama

Cirra AI Salesforce Admin MCP Server

user_create

Create a new Salesforce user. You can clone an existing user by providing the template parameter, or create a new user from scratch by providing the profile and other parameters

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
emailYesThe email of the user
profileNoThe name or ID of the profile to use for the new user. Not required if template is provided
sf_userNo(optional) Salesforce username to identify the connection to use. Omit this to use the current default connection.
lastNameYesThe last name of the user
templateNoThe name, username, email or id of an existing user to use a a template for the new user
usernameYesThe username of the user. Must be globally unique across all Salesforce organizations
firstNameYesThe first name of the user
propertiesNoAn optional map of additional properties to set on the new user
cirra_ai_teamNo(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit it when this call carries the context_handle from cirra_ai_init, which names the team for the conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either the context_handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'.
context_handleNo(recommended) The conversation context handle returned by cirra_ai_init in this conversation. Pass the exact context_handle value from the most recent cirra_ai_init result so this call runs against the team and Salesforce connection selected for this conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several Cirra AI teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either this handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'; a call with neither is refused.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
messageYes
resultsNo
successYes
warningNo
errorCodeNo
errorCountNo
resultCountNo
artifactTypeNo
requestCountNo
skippedCountNo
successCountNo
artifactCategoryNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / cirra_ai_team / description
      Previous value: -"(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit to use your current/default team."New value: +"(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit it when this call carries the context_handle from cirra_ai_init, which names the team for the conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either the context_handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'."
    • addedInput schema / properties / context_handle
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "(recommended) The conversation context handle returned by cirra_ai_init in this conversation. Pass the exact context_handle value from the most recent cirra_ai_init result so this call runs against the team and Salesforce connection selected for this conversation. A user with more than one place to work (several Cirra AI teams, or a team and a personal account) must pass either this handle or 'cirra_ai_team' + 'sf_user'; a call with neither is refused.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "artifactCategory": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "artifactType": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "errorCode": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "errorCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "requestCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "resultCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "results": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": true,
      +        "properties": {},
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "skippedCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "successCount": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "warning": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success",
      +    "message"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cirra_ai_team
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "(optional) Cirra team ID or name that owns the Salesforce connection to use for this call. Must be provided together with 'sf_user'. Use it to run against a specific team's connection without changing your default team — e.g. to keep separate chats on Salesforce orgs in different teams. Omit to use your current/default team.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Added
  4. Removed
  5. Added
  6. Removed
  7. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this is a non-readonly, non-idempotent, open-world write, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the clone-vs-scratch behavioral split, but says nothing about whether the new user is created active or inactive, whether Salesforce emails the user, or what permissions/edition constraints apply — meaningful gaps for a user-provisioning tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core action, then the mode split. Nothing is wasted and no clause needs re-reading.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With rich annotations, 100% schema coverage and an output schema, the description covers the essential decision an agent must make (template vs from-scratch). The remaining omission — post-creation state and prerequisites — is real but modest given how much the structured fields already carry.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so every parameter (including the heavy `context_handle` / `sf_user` / `cirra_ai_team` connection trio) is already documented in the schema. The description's mention of `template` and `profile` largely restates what the schema says ("Not required if template is provided"), so it adds only framing, not new parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("Create a new Salesforce user") and immediately decomposes it into the two supported creation modes (clone via `template`, or build via `profile`). It is clearly distinguishable from `user_update` by verb, though it never names that sibling explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives real routing guidance between the two creation paths: use `template` to clone an existing user, use `profile` plus other fields to create from scratch. It stops short of when-not-to-use cases (e.g. when to prefer `user_update` on an existing user, or prerequisites such as profile/license availability).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources