Skip to main content
Glama

CallMCP — Phone Call MCP Server

Get WhatsApp Status

get_whatsapp_status
Read-onlyIdempotent

Check whether WhatsApp is connected on a business's KaiCalls number, read live from the carrier. Connected only once the number is verified for WhatsApp; otherwise says whether the owner's link is still waiting, expired or failed.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "business_id": "<business_id>"
    },
    "name": "get_whatsapp_status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
business_idYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent when success is false
successYesWhether the tool completed successfully
connectedNo
connectionsNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds real context beyond the annotations: the value is read live from the carrier, and connected is only true once the number is verified, with distinct waiting/expired/failed states otherwise. That explains what the returned state means and why it may lag, which annotations (readOnly/idempotent) do not cover.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences, front-loaded with the action and resource, with no filler. The second sentence is dense but every clause (verification gate, waiting/expired/failed) carries semantic weight.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema exists and annotations already declare the safe read-only profile, the description covers the remaining essentials: what is checked, where the data comes from, and the possible states. Only the identification of business_id is left unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Single parameter with 0% schema description coverage, so the description must carry it. It only implies that business_id scopes the check to a business and its KaiCalls number; it adds no format, source, or error-condition guidance for that identifier.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb and resource: checks whether WhatsApp is connected on a business's KaiCalls number. The scope ('on a business's KaiCalls number') is specific enough to separate it from a generic channel-status check, though no sibling is named for contrast.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the object of the check; there is no explicit 'use this when...' or pointer to connect_whatsapp for initiating a link versus this tool for verifying one. An agent can infer the read/verify role, but must decide on its own between this and nearby status siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.