Skip to main content
Glama

CallMCP — Phone Call MCP Server

Get Lead

get_lead
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get full details for a single lead by ID, including the latest AI lead score and explanation.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "lead_id": "<lead_id>"
    },
    "name": "get_lead"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
lead_idYesThe lead ID to fetch

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
leadNo
errorNoPresent when success is false
successYesWhether the tool completed successfully

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false and a closed-world scope, so the safety profile is fully covered. The description adds only that the response carries a score and its explanation, which the output schema likely already conveys, and says nothing about not-found behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One front-loaded sentence naming the resource, the lookup key, and the payload, with no redundant restatement of the title. Nothing to trim.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need no elaboration, and annotations cover safety; the only residual gap is error behavior for an invalid or missing lead ID. For a one-parameter read tool the description is essentially sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a single documented parameter ('The lead ID to fetch'), and the description's 'by ID' adds no format or sourcing detail beyond that. Baseline 3 applies since the schema does the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get full details for a single lead by ID') and adds what comes back (AI lead score plus explanation). The singular, ID-based framing implicitly separates it from list_leads, though no sibling is named explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: an agent can infer this is the detail-fetch for one lead versus list_leads for enumeration, but the description never states when to prefer it or what to do when the ID is unknown. No explicit alternatives or preconditions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.