Seller get me
seller_get_meFetch the seller record bound to the calling principal or seller-side agent instance. Refuses when the caller has no seller record.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
seller_get_meFetch the seller record bound to the calling principal or seller-side agent instance. Refuses when the caller has no seller record.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, non-destructive. Description adds the error behavior of refusing when no seller record exists, which is useful context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence conveys the essential purpose and one key behavior without fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and no output schema, the description is complete; it covers the main use case and error condition.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters; baseline score applies. Description correctly avoids inventing parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb 'fetch', resource 'seller record', and scope 'bound to calling principal', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools that may fetch other sellers or listings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied that this is for the current seller, but does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools like 'sellers_get' or 'seller_get_listing'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.