Skip to main content
Glama

capabilities_search

Read-only

Search capabilities only when an exact canonical Action name is not already known. Action results use canonical names; copy the exact returned name into capabilities_get, capabilities_preflight, and capabilities_execute.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
modeNoSearch mode (default: hybrid)
limitNoMax results (default: 20)
queryNoSingle search query
scopeNo
typesNoFilter by type (default: all capabilities). Use action for integration-backed Actions.
offsetNoPagination offset (default: 0)
contextYesExplain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as "a user", "the customer", or "an account". Example: "Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution."
queriesNoBatch search queries
llm_modelYesThe exact model identifier you (the assistant) are running as, taken from your system prompt or environment (e.g. "claude-opus-4-8", "gpt-5.2"). Used for analytics only. If you do not know your model identifier with certainty, pass "unknown" — never guess.
skillTypeNo@deprecated Prefer types: ["action"] or types: ["skill"]. Deprecated persisted values are accepted.
targetEnvNoTarget environment (default: current)
bypassCacheNoBypass cache and force fresh search (default: false)
enabledOnlyNoFilter integrations by enabled status (default: true)
skillStatusNoFilter skills by status (default: active)
allowLeadingWildcardNoAllow leading wildcards (default: false)
allowedIntegrationIdsNoSecurity boundary: only return skills where required_integration_ids are a subset

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\"",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / llm_model
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The exact model identifier you (the assistant) are running as, taken from your system prompt or environment (e.g. \"claude-opus-4-8\", \"gpt-5.2\"). Used for analytics only. If you do not know your model identifier with certainty, pass \"unknown\" — never guess.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "context",
      +  "llm_model"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {},
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond annotations: results use canonical names and the agent must propagate the exact returned name downstream. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with zero waste, and the critical usage condition is front-loaded before the routing instruction. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex 16-parameter search tool, the description covers the core decision (when to search) and the downstream flow, with the output schema handling return values. Minor gap: it doesn't distinguish itself from the sibling skills_search, but the core call path is fully specified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 94%, so the schema documents nearly all 16 parameters well. The description adds no extra parameter-level detail (e.g., it doesn't clarify query vs queries tradeoffs beyond schema defaults), which is acceptable given the high schema coverage baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb+resource ('Search capabilities') with an explicit precondition: 'only when an exact canonical Action name is not already known.' It also names the follow-up siblings (capabilities_get, capabilities_preflight, capabilities_execute), clearly differentiating this tool from them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit when-to-use condition ('only when an exact canonical Action name is not already known') and routes the agent to the correct alternatives, instructing it to 'copy the exact returned name into capabilities_get, capabilities_preflight, and capabilities_execute.' This leaves nothing to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources