Skip to main content
Glama

get_episode_storyboard

Read-only

Episode outfits, every scene's stored storyboard image, location, full shots and animatic. Returns durable R2 media URLs when available.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "series_id": "<series_id>",
      "n": "<n>"
    },
    "name": "get_episode_storyboard"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nYes
series_idYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

B3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful behavioral context by stating that durable R2 media URLs are returned when available, but it does not explain pagination, failure modes, or authentication needs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loads the returned asset types in a single list followed by a URL-availability note. It wastes no words, though the first sentence is a noun phrase without an explicit action verb.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description appropriately enumerates the returned content types and the R2 media URL behavior. However, it is incomplete for the required series_id and n inputs and does not clarify the relationship to sibling episode tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has two required parameters with 0% schema description coverage, so the description must compensate. It does not mention series_id or n at all; only the word 'Episode' weakly implies the n parameter, leaving both required parameters semantically undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the specific resources returned: episode outfits, per-scene storyboard images, location, full shots, and animatic. This clearly differentiates it from siblings like get_episode_script or get_episode, though the lack of a direct verb ('Get' is only in the tool name) slightly reduces clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus get_episode, get_episode_script, or other sibling tools. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or alternative-routing instructions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources