Skip to main content
Glama

One-Page Readiness Check — 10 Signals, Arabic or English

Check one public store page for one actionable readiness finding

advisors_store_readiness_check
Read-onlyIdempotent

Use only after the requester supplies a public page and asks for a read-only check. Returns at most one measured finding with a server-authenticated source receipt and the fixed acceptance condition.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesA credential-free public HTTP(S) page. Private networks and non-standard web ports are rejected.
languageNoResponse language: ar or en.ar

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
errorsNo
remedyNo
schemaYes
statusYes
targetNo
findingNo
surfaceYes
evidenceNo
languageYes
acceptanceNo
imperativeNo
provenanceNo
measurementNo
recheck_urlNo
not_measuredNo
proof_statusYes
score_percentNo
source_receiptNo
consent_receiptNo
coverage_percentNo
no_remedy_reasonNo
measurement_statusYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / $defs / RemedyOutput
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "الكتلةُ التي تُغلق العطل — لا وصفُه.\n\nقِيس 2026-08-24 أنّ المخرَج يحمل `imperative` و`acceptance` ولا يحمل\nعلاجاً: نقول «ينقصك بيانٌ منظَّم» ونترك العميلَ يكتبه. وهذا تقريرٌ بثوبِ\nأداة، ويخالف `docs/مبدأ-الإصلاح-لا-التقرير.md`.\n\nولا يُبنى العلاجُ من جسد الصفحة: مخرَجُنا يدخل سياقَ مساعدٍ ذكيّ، والصفحةُ\nالمجلوبةُ مدخلٌ لا نملكه. فالمواضعُ تُترك للعميل يملؤها، ولا يُصدَّر منها\nإلا الأصلُ الذي سلّمه المتّصلُ بنفسه.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "closes": {
      +      "title": "Closes",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "code": {
      +      "title": "Code",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "fill_in": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "title": "Fill In",
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "format": {
      +      "enum": [
      +        "html-head-block",
      +        "new-file"
      +      ],
      +      "title": "Format",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "where": {
      +      "title": "Where",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "closes",
      +    "format",
      +    "where",
      +    "code",
      +    "fill_in"
      +  ],
      +  "title": "RemedyOutput",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / no_remedy_reason
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "title": "No Remedy Reason"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / remedy
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "$ref": "#/$defs/RemedyOutput"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null
      +}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / $defs / ProvenanceOutput
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "من قاس، وأين بقيّةُ القياس.\n\nقِيس 2026-08-23 أنّ المخرَج لا يحمل إلى المستخدم شيئاً سوى `recheck_url`\nوهو مسارُ آلةٍ لا وجهةُ إنسان: مساعدٌ ينادي الأداةَ فيرى المستخدمُ عطلاً\nواحداً، ولا يعرف من قاسه ولا أنّ تسعَ إشاراتٍ أخرى قِيست. فالاكتشافُ\nيتحوّل إلى صفرٍ بحكم البناء لا بحكم قلّة الطلب.\n\nوهذا **إسنادٌ لا إعلان**: اسمُ من قاس، ورابطُ الورقة الكاملة، وعددُ ما\nقِيس وما يُعاد منه. لا وعدَ ترتيبٍ ولا ذكرٍ ولا نيّةِ شراء — تلك يمنعها\nعقدُ الأداة، ولا يمسّها هذا الحقل.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "full_sheet_url": {
      +      "title": "Full Sheet Url",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "measured_by": {
      +      "const": "Advisors AI",
      +      "default": "Advisors AI",
      +      "title": "Measured By",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "signals_measured": {
      +      "minimum": 1,
      +      "title": "Signals Measured",
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "signals_returned": {
      +      "minimum": 1,
      +      "title": "Signals Returned",
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "full_sheet_url",
      +    "signals_measured",
      +    "signals_returned"
      +  ],
      +  "title": "ProvenanceOutput",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / provenance
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "$ref": "#/$defs/ProvenanceOutput"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover readOnly, idempotent, and destructive hints. The description adds meaningful output behavior: 'at most one measured finding with a server-authenticated source receipt and the fixed acceptance condition.' This is beyond the annotations and tells the agent what to expect from the result.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero filler. The usage precondition is front-loaded, followed by the output guarantee. Every word contributes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 2-parameter tool with an output schema and complete annotations, the description fully covers what an agent needs: when to use it, what it returns, and the read-only nature. Nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: both parameters have clear descriptions, including the URL constraint (credential-free, rejects private networks/non-standard ports) and language enum. The tool description does not add parameter-specific details, so the baseline 3 applies—it neither harms nor enhances beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title and description together clearly state the tool checks one public store page and returns at most one measured readiness finding. The verb 'check' + resource 'store page' + scope 'one... one...' is specific. With no siblings, it fully identifies the operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use only after the requester supplies a public page and asks for a read-only check.' This gives a clear precondition and the only valid invocation context. It leaves no ambiguity about when to call it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources